Good morning,

Twenty-five years ago today, our country changed forever.

Like so many Americans, I will never forget where I was on September 11, 2001. At the time, my family lived in New Jersey, not far from New York City, which made the events of that day feel particularly close to home.

Today, we remember the nearly 3,000 lives lost, the families forever changed, and the first responders and ordinary Americans who demonstrated extraordinary courage.

And with that perspective, we turn to this week’s Toledo Money.

This week, we take a closer look at a Northwest Ohio communications company pursuing an interesting strategy: trying to win at scale by offering its services at a lower price. We dig into the numbers, the economics behind the model, and what the strategy tells us about the business.

We also step slightly outside our usual lane.

Toledo Money is intentionally optimistic about Northwest Ohio. We want to tell the stories of the people, businesses and institutions building this region.

But optimism shouldn't mean abandoning scrutiny.

Local journalism has historically played an important role in holding businesses, institutions and community leaders accountable for what they say and what they ultimately deliver. As Toledo Money grows, we believe there is a place for some of that here, too — respectfully, fairly and grounded in the facts.

We hope you enjoy this week’s issue. And as always, our inbox and socials are open. We look forward to the conversation.

This weeks shoutout goes to Donna Martin, a staple in the Toledo business community. Donna has strong involvement in the UT Family Business Center and is active in helping the next generation grow through non-profit efforts. Thank you Donna for being apart of the Toledo Money community.

Owens Corning | $OC ( ▲ 3.46% )

Dana Incorporated | $DAN ( ▲ 1.34% )

The Andersons | $ANDE ( ▼ 1.27% )

Owens Illinois | $OI ( ▼ 1.51% )

Welltower Inc. | $WELL ( ▼ 0.04% )

Marathon Petroleum Corporation | $MPC ( ▲ 0.89% )

First Solar | $FSLR ( ▲ 0.9% )

This not a paid ad, but it is answering the question thousands in the region have been asking. Who is Rocket and how can they provide WiFi at such cheap rates?!

Rocket Internet offers a glimpse into how one of Toledo’s longest-standing communications companies is responding to a more competitive broadband market.

For decades, Buckeye Broadband has been one of the most recognizable names in Toledo telecommunications. Now, its parent organization appears to be taking a different approach to competing for broadband customers.

The evidence is Rocket Internet, a lower-cost internet brand operating in Northwest Ohio and other markets connected to Block Communications. Public trademark records show the ROCKET INTERNET name was filed in July 2025 by Buckeye Cablevision, Inc., the company behind Buckeye Broadband.

That makes Rocket less interesting as a standalone internet provider and more interesting as a window into the strategy of an established Toledo company.

In simplified terms:

Block Communications → Buckeye Broadband → Rocket Internet.

The question, then, isn’t simply what Rocket sells.

It’s why Buckeye needed Rocket in the first place.

Broadband has historically been an important business for Block Communications. In a 2024 ratings report, S&P Global described Block’s broadband revenue as “high-margin” and said the company’s cable operations represented roughly 90% of its earnings.

But that same report pointed to a changing competitive environment.

Block had lost roughly 2,100 broadband subscribers during the preceding 12 months, with S&P specifically citing increasing competition and greater overlap with AT&T fiber. Average revenue per customer had also declined modestly.

That creates an important business challenge.

An incumbent provider has significant infrastructure already in the ground, employees supporting it and capital invested in maintaining and upgrading the network.

But when competitors begin offering consumers credible alternatives, the economics of retaining a customer begin to change. Rocket may be Block’s answer.

Rocket currently offers broadband at prices substantially below comparable download speeds marketed under the Buckeye brand.

The services are not identical. Rocket operates with a leaner, more self-service model, while Buckeye offers additional customer support, features and higher-end fiber products.

That distinction matters. But so does the size of the pricing difference.

Rather than dramatically repositioning Buckeye Broadband itself, Block appears to have created a separate brand capable of competing aggressively for more price-sensitive customers.

It’s a strategy seen across other industries. Companies frequently create multiple brands to serve different portions of the market without weakening the positioning of their flagship business.

For Block, Rocket potentially allows Buckeye to remain the full-service broadband brand while creating another option for households where price is the primary purchasing decision. And Rocket is not limited to Toledo.

The brand has appeared in markets connected to other Block Communications broadband operations, including areas served by MaxxSouth Broadband in Mississippi.

That suggests Rocket may represent a broader corporate strategy rather than a one-off Northwest Ohio promotion.

Rocket also provides an interesting lesson in broadband economics.

Its pricing does not tell us Buckeye’s profit margin on an individual internet customer. Building and maintaining broadband infrastructure remains capital intensive, and the two services have meaningful differences.

But once infrastructure already passes a home, the cost of retaining another customer can be very different from the cost of building the network.

That leads to a simple possibility:

A heavily discounted customer may be more valuable than a customer lost to a competitor.

And that may be the most revealing part of Rocket Internet.

For years, the story around Toledo broadband was largely about the providers available to consumers. The emergence of Rocket suggests the more interesting story now may be what increased competition is forcing established providers to do differently.

Rocket appears like a challenger entering the market.

In reality, it may be something more telling:

a Toledo incumbent building its own challenger before someone else takes the customer.

The sale of One SeaGate is, on its face, exactly the kind of headline downtown Toledo needs.

A landmark office tower has new ownership. Estone Technology plans to move its headquarters into the building. The owners are talking about investment, modernization and turning the property into something resembling a technology hub.

All good. But this is also where the harder questions should begin.

Economic development tends to reward the announcement. The press conference happens. The renderings get circulated. The words “innovation,” “technology” and “jobs” quickly make their way into the narrative.

The actual results tend to come much later. And that distinction matters.

Estone is an established Toledo-area company, and moving its headquarters downtown is a legitimate commitment. But the broader vision for One SeaGate — more tenants, more technology companies, more investment and more jobs — is still largely a vision.

It is simply where the deal stands today.

The same discipline should apply to companies like ShareViral, which has generated attention around its Toledo presence and the possibility of a larger technology and advanced-manufacturing operation.

That could become an important story for the region. But “could” is doing a lot of work.

There is limited public visibility today into the company’s revenue, Toledo-specific employment, capital deployed locally or the number of jobs that would ultimately accompany an expansion.

That does not mean the opportunity should be dismissed. It means it should not yet be counted.

For Toledo, that distinction is increasingly important.

Cities can create their own economic-development mythology if every prospective investment becomes a victory before the investment actually occurs. A startup considering Toledo is different from a company hiring 100 people here. A new owner promising renovations is different from millions of dollars actually being spent.

Northwest Ohio has also seen the other side of property ownership.

Fallen Timbers spent years under owners based outside the region before changing hands again, this time to a group talking openly about major reinvestment.

The lesson is not that outside capital is bad. The lesson is that capital needs to be followed by execution. Who owns the building matters. What happens after the closing matters more.

So the One SeaGate transaction deserves optimism.

The Reichle | Klein Group helped put one of downtown Toledo’s most important assets into new hands. Estone is making a real commitment by locating its headquarters there. And a serious effort to reposition the building could have implications well beyond a single piece of real estate.

But the scoreboard from here should be relatively simple:

And two years from now, is One SeaGate materially different than it is today?

That is the story worth following.

Because supporting Toledo does not require grading every announcement as a success. Sometimes the most constructive thing a region can do is celebrate the ambition, and then keep score.

Here are a few headlines we are snacking on

AI made PMs faster. Multiplayer mode is still broken.

A PM can summarize research, draft a PRD, and mock up a prototype before lunch. The hard part starts when the team has to decide what actually gets built.

Jira Product Discovery gives product teams one place to capture insights, prioritize ideas with consistent frameworks, and build living roadmaps stakeholders can rally around.

And because it’s connected to Jira, the context behind every decision stays with the work—so developers and their agents know not just what to build, but why.

AI helps PMs move faster. Jira Product Discovery helps the whole team build with confidence.

Get Started for Free.