As Thanksgiving approaches, it's a good time to pause, reflect and appreciate the people and businesses that make Northwest Ohio a great place to call home. At Toledo Money, we're thankful for the growing community of readers, business owners and local leaders who believe in what we're building.

When we launched Toledo Money, our goal was simple: fill a gap in the local media landscape by bringing business, financial and economic news together in one place. We want to help you understand what's happening across our region, who's building something new, where investment is flowing and what it means for the future of Northwest Ohio.

In March 2027, we'll celebrate two years of Toledo Money. We're proud of how far we've come, but even more excited about where we're going. As we continue to grow, one of the best ways you can support us is by sharing Toledo Money with a friend, colleague or someone in your network who would enjoy staying connected to the business community around them.

Thank you for being part of the journey. Happy Thanksgiving from all of us at Toledo Money!

I grew up playing baseball alongside Steve Duby, who went on to play at the University of Toledo. Having known Steve for years, I can tell you that his character, integrity, and principles have always stood out.

Now, Steve and his wife are taking their entrepreneurial journey together with the launch of Toledo Broom, a new cleaning service serving Northwest Ohio. One of the things I love most about our region is seeing good people build businesses and invest in the communities they call home.

If you're looking for a quality cleaning service from people who genuinely care about doing things the right way, I can't recommend Steve and his wife enough.

Here's to supporting local businesses and, more importantly, the good people behind them.

Owens Corning | $OC ( ▼ 1.35% )

Dana Incorporated | $DAN ( ▲ 2.75% )

The Andersons | $ANDE ( ▲ 0.97% )

Owens Illinois | $OI ( ▲ 1.64% )

Welltower Inc. | $WELL ( ▼ 0.19% )

Marathon Petroleum Corporation | $MPC ( ▲ 0.44% )

First Solar | $FSLR ( ▼ 0.53% )

Cherry Street Mission's $22 million housing development addresses a critical community need. But it also raises a larger question: Can Northwest Ohio make new housing development financially viable without public incentives?

There is little debate that Northwest Ohio needs more solutions to homelessness. Stable housing, access to mental health services, and opportunities for individuals to rebuild their lives are worthwhile investments in our community.

That is precisely what Cherry Street Mission and Lucas Metropolitan Housing intend to deliver through Mission Point, a new permanent supportive housing development in downtown Toledo.

The project will create 65 one-bedroom apartments, accompanied by supportive services intended to help individuals experiencing chronic homelessness achieve long-term stability.

It's an admirable mission.

But one number deserves a closer look.

$22 million.

That's the reported development cost, or approximately $338,000 per apartment.

For a region that prides itself on affordability and making resources go further, it's reasonable to ask whether that represents the most efficient deployment of capital.

And perhaps more importantly, what does that figure tell us about the broader economics of real estate development in Toledo?

To be fair, Mission Point isn't a traditional apartment development.

The project is designed to serve individuals facing complex challenges, with access to mental health services, substance-use support, job training, and other resources. Its development costs include more than the construction of 65 individual apartments.

According to the project's original application to the Ohio Housing Finance Agency, the development includes approximately 56,300 square feet of space, incorporating common areas and facilities supporting its mission.

The original application projected approximately $20.75 million in development costs, below the agency's applicable cost-containment ceiling. The more recently reported $22 million figure represents an increase worth understanding.

Could $22 million have provided stable housing and supportive services to more than 65 individuals?

Could existing properties have been acquired and rehabilitated? Could smaller developments distributed throughout the region have achieved comparable outcomes? Were alternative approaches evaluated, and what made new construction the preferred solution?

Perhaps those options were thoroughly examined and determined to be less effective. If so, that analysis would add valuable context to the public conversation.

The question isn't whether individuals experiencing homelessness deserve investment. They absolutely do. The question is whether we're deploying limited resources in ways that deliver the greatest sustainable impact.

Mission Point also exposes a broader question facing Northwest Ohio's development community.

If constructing 65 apartments requires approximately $22 million, what does that suggest about the economics facing private developers considering new residential projects? Especially the Four Corners Project to bring ~400 units for $190M (~$475,000 per unit).

There are important distinctions. Mission Point is specialized supportive housing, not a conventional market-rate apartment building. Its design, services, financing, and operating model are different.

Nevertheless, the project provides an opportunity to examine the relationship between construction costs and what Toledo's real estate market can financially support.

Construction materials, labor, financing, insurance, and development risks aren't necessarily cheaper simply because Toledo is an affordable place to live.

Yet the rents local residents can reasonably pay remain comparatively modest.

Consider the economics.

An October 2026 market snapshot from Apartments.com placed average downtown Toledo one-bedroom rent at approximately $1,024 per month.

At that rent, an apartment generates roughly $12,300 annually before vacancies and operating expenses.

Assuming operating expenses consume 35% of revenue, the apartment would generate approximately $8,000 in annual net operating income. At an illustrative 5.5% capitalization rate, that implies a property value of roughly $145,000.

Compare that with Mission Point's reported development cost of approximately $338,000 per unit.

The difference is substantial.

This isn't an apples-to-apples comparison, nor does it establish what a conventional Toledo apartment would actually cost to construct. New market-rate apartments may also command higher rents.

But the illustration highlights a fundamental challenge: A property can cost substantially more to develop than the income it generates would justify in the private investment market.

And private investors don't simply need to recover their initial capital. They need to earn a return appropriate for the risks they're assuming.

When those economics don't align, projects don't move forward without another source of capital or a different investment structure.

Mission Point's financing structure is another important consideration.

The development has received support through low-income housing tax credits and other public financing mechanisms, along with rental assistance intended to support its ongoing operations.

These tools exist for legitimate reasons. Affordable and supportive housing often serves populations whose incomes cannot support conventional development economics.

But they also prompt a broader question about the region's development environment.

Are tax credits, abatements, and public financing simply encouraging investment, or have they become necessary to make new construction financially feasible?

In a healthy development market, private investors should be able to identify projects where anticipated revenue supports construction costs, operating expenses, financing, and an appropriate return on invested capital.

Public incentives may improve those economics or advance important community objectives that private markets otherwise wouldn't deliver.

But if nearly every meaningful new development requires some combination of public participation, tax relief, or subsidized financing, we should understand why.

Is the challenge construction cost? Land availability? Local income levels? Financing costs? Regulatory requirements? Insufficient rental demand at the prices necessary to support new construction?

Or is it some combination of all of them?

These aren't questions unique to Toledo, but they're particularly relevant to a region attempting to attract investment while preserving its reputation for affordability.

This conversation becomes even more relevant when considering downtown Toledo's residential future.

Local development leaders have pointed to strong residential occupancy as evidence that downtown needs additional housing options.

That demand is encouraging.

More residents can support restaurants, retail, entertainment, and the broader economic vitality of downtown. A larger residential population can also make the urban core more attractive to employers and prospective investors.

But high occupancy doesn't necessarily make new construction financially viable.

Existing apartments may be nearly full at current rental rates while the rents required to support new development remain beyond what the market will bear.

It's entirely possible for downtown Toledo to simultaneously experience strong housing demand, limited available inventory, and unfavorable economics for new construction.

That's the paradox: Toledo may need more housing than the private market can afford to build.

And if that's the case, the conversation shouldn't end with celebrating individual projects that successfully assemble financing. It should extend to understanding what prevents additional projects from moving forward in the first place.

What would need to change for private investors to finance more residential construction without relying heavily on tax credits, abatements, or other public incentives?

That question deserves attention from developers, employers, economic development organizations, and local government alike.

None of this diminishes the work of Cherry Street Mission or the organizations supporting Mission Point.

Their commitment to addressing homelessness deserves recognition, and the services they provide are important to Northwest Ohio.

Nor should supportive housing be evaluated exclusively through the same financial measures as conventional market-rate apartments.

Housing stability can produce benefits that don't appear on a property's income statement, including reduced shelter utilization, improved health outcomes, and potentially lower costs for emergency and public services.

Those outcomes matter.

But understanding them requires measurement.

What will Mission Point's annual operating costs be? How will housing retention be evaluated? What outcomes are expected for residents? How will the community determine whether the investment delivered the intended benefits?

And could alternative approaches have achieved similar or better outcomes with the same resources?

These are reasonable questions for any significant community investment.

In business, we routinely evaluate capital allocation based on cost, alternatives, financial sustainability, risk, and expected outcomes.

Community development deserves the same discipline, even when its returns are measured in improved lives rather than financial distributions.

Mission Point represents an investment in individuals who need stable housing and access to meaningful support.

That objective deserves recognition.

But a $22 million development also deserves thoughtful financial scrutiny.

At approximately $338,000 per apartment, the project creates an opportunity to examine not only the efficiency of this particular investment, but the larger economic realities influencing development throughout Northwest Ohio.

Because the challenge may extend well beyond one project.

If Toledo's construction costs are increasingly disconnected from the rents and property values its market can support, attracting private investment will become more difficult, regardless of how compelling the underlying demand may be.

And if public incentives are essential to closing that gap, we should understand both their value and the long-term implications of relying on them.

A $22 million investment deserves a $22 million explanation.

Because maximizing the impact of limited resources, creating conditions that attract private capital, and building a financially sustainable region should be objectives we can all support.

And ultimately, Northwest Ohio shouldn't just be asking how to finance its next development.

We should be asking what it will take to make building here economically viable in the first place.

From financing small businesses and revitalizing downtown buildings to supporting major institutions and preparing industrial land for development, the Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority plays a significant role in getting projects across the finish line.

When people think about economic development in Toledo, they often think about the businesses opening, buildings being renovated, or new investments coming into the region. What they may not see is the financing and coordination that make many of those projects possible.

That's where the Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority plays a role that extends well beyond its traditional port operations.

Through a variety of financing programs, the Port has supported more than 1,000 projects, driving over $2 billion in investment and helping create or retain more than 30,000 jobs.

Much of this work happens behind the scenes. The Port works with businesses, lenders, developers, and other institutions to identify financing structures that can make projects financially feasible, whether that's a small business purchasing equipment, a nonprofit renovating a building, or a developer bringing an older downtown property back into use.

One of the Port's most established financing tools is the Northwest Ohio Bond Fund, which has issued more than $475 million in municipal bonds across more than 100 projects since 1988.

The program, which is rated “A” by S&P Global Ratings, helps organizations access long-term, fixed-rate financing for projects that might otherwise be difficult to fund through conventional lending. The Northwest Ohio Bond Fund can finance fixed assets, such as owner-occupied real estate, machinery, equipment, and infrastructure for eligible for-profit and nonprofit entities.

Recent downtown Toledo examples include:

The Port also participated in financing a major renovation at the Toledo Museum of Art. Its aging HVAC system had reached the end of its useful life, creating a need for a $25 million project. Maintaining precise temperature and environmental conditions is critical to protecting the museum's collection.

The Northwest Ohio Bond Fund's lending limit was $11 million, so the Port brought in the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority and the Columbus-Franklin County Finance Authority, each contributing approximately $6.5 million through their respective bond funds.

The project began in 2024, with completion expected in late 2026 or early 2027.

The collaboration demonstrates how multiple financing authorities can work together to support projects that extend beyond the traditional business lending market. Institutions like museums can benefit from this financing structure because they may not have the conventional credit ratings required for other financing options.

Beyond major institutions and downtown redevelopment, the Port has spent more than 30 years helping small and medium-sized businesses finance expansion.

Its U.S. Small Business Administration 504 loan program, administered through its Northwest Ohio Development Assistance Corporation, supports fixed-asset investments such as new construction, building purchases and/or improvements, manufacturing equipment, and non-rolling-stock operational equipment.

The program combines financing from the SBA and a third-party lender, allowing businesses to access financing terms that may not be available through conventional lending alone. Generally, eligible for-profit businesses must occupy at least 51% of the property. The program also supports start-ups and refinancing.

Since its inception, the program has supported more than 210 projects, facilitated over $97 million in SBA 504 financing, and helped create or retain more than 4,400 jobs. Combined with other investment, those projects represent more than $266 million in total project costs.

One example is Adventus Climbing, Northwest Ohio's first indoor climbing gym, located on Reynolds Road. After years of planning, the ownership group purchased vacant land and built a new facility with financing support from Directions Credit Union and the Port's SBA 504 program.

The total project cost was approximately $3.8 million, with two SBA loans supporting the building and equipment. The start-up created 15 new jobs.

The Port also administers the Ohio Regional 166 loan program, another fixed-asset financing tool for for-profit businesses investing in their facilities and operations. Interest rates are as low as 3% fixed. Since its inception more than 30 years ago, the program has supported more than 145 projects, facilitated over $37 million in financing, and helped create or retain more than 6,700 jobs. Those projects represent more than $115 million in total project costs when combined with other investment.

One example is Fry HVAC. The owner purchased a vacant industrial warehouse property on Hamilton Street. This $850,000 project allowed the company to move its operations from another city into downtown Toledo and repurpose the site, adding new economic benefits to the City of Toledo. A total of 25 jobs were retained or created.

Another important piece of the Port's economic development work is PACE financing, offered through Better Buildings Northwest Ohio.

Property Assessed Clean Energy financing helps commercial property owners pay for qualifying energy-efficiency improvements. While the term might bring solar panels to mind, many projects involve more practical improvements, including HVAC systems, windows, doors, and other building upgrades.

The financing can be particularly useful when older buildings need significant improvements or when developers are considering converting commercial properties into apartments or mixed-use spaces.

One distinguishing feature is that the assessment stays with the property if it is sold, transferring to the next owner until the financing is paid off.

Now in its 15th year, the program has supported more than 200 projects and nearly $70 million in financing, with an average project financing amount of approximately $400,000.

Several recognizable Toledo projects have benefited.

The former Burt's Theater at 725 Jefferson Avenue was redeveloped by IBC into commercial space and 15 market-rate apartments. The total investment was $7.6 million, including $1 million in PACE financing.

Toledo Pickle, developed through a partnership involving Metroparks, transformed a former City of Toledo truck warehouse into a pickleball facility. The project represented a $7 million investment, with $1.9 million provided through PACE financing.

Other downtown projects utilizing PACE include TolHouse at 1447 North Summit, The Mez/Magnolia at 710 Monroe Street, and Hotel Royal at 337 Broadway.

Financing is only part of the Port Authority's economic development role. It also owns and operates a substantial portfolio of properties and infrastructure throughout Lucas County.

Its assets include Overland Industrial Park, Farnsworth Business Park, Express Industrial Park, Ironville Terminal, One Government Center, One and Two Maritime Plaza, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Plaza, three downtown parking garages, Toledo Express Airport, Toledo Executive Airport, Toledo Shipyard, and facilities at the Port of Toledo.

At Farnsworth, Express, and Overland Industrial Parks, land remains available and is being marketed to potential businesses and developers. The Port recently completed infrastructure improvements, including a new road at Farnsworth Business Park.

Perhaps one of the clearest examples of its approach is the former Jeep property.

The Port purchased the property in 2010 with the goal of returning the vacant industrial site to productive use. Through environmental remediation, site preparation, and infrastructure improvements, it transformed the property into a business park that now houses Dana Incorporated, Mayco International, and All-Phase Electric.

Today, those businesses support more than 1,200 jobs at the site.

The common thread across these projects is the Port Authority's ability to bring together financing, property, lenders, developers, and businesses to find solutions.

It doesn't necessarily need to own the property to facilitate a financing arrangement. When it does own the land, it can use capital leases or bond financing to help an end user develop a facility, either through construction by the business or by building the facility and leasing it back.

Its teams work across disciplines to identify the financing structure that best fits the needs of the business or organization.

For Northwest Ohio, that means development isn't limited to the projects that can secure conventional financing on their own.

Sometimes it takes a new financing structure, a willing lending partner, or the redevelopment of a property that has sat vacant for years.

The Port Authority's role is to help connect those pieces and turn available capital, underutilized property, and business ideas into investments that move Lucas County forward.

Here are a few headlines we are snacking on

For US farm, ranch and small business owners.

Airlines hedge fuel. Food companies hedge crops. For decades, protecting a business from outcomes it can't control took a broker, a trading desk and an order size most owners never had.

Kalshi opens hedging up to small businesses. Pick the outcome that would hurt you, like a fuel spike, a heat wave, a new tariff or a rate hike, and take a position on it, starting at a few dollars. If it happens, the payout offsets the hit. If it doesn't, the contract expires and the good month was the point.

A California goat herder and a Maryland tea company already do it, and CNBC, Reuters and The New York Times have covered businesses hedging on Kalshi.

Kalshi is a federally regulated exchange.

See how other owners hedge